Oleksandr Timchenko

I’ve long thought what feedback to leave, completely negative or completely positive I can’t leave because there was a lot of nuances.So I tend to neutral and describe my own impressions from the work.So, in principle, it’s ok, the subject of the diploma itself was very interesting, although at times it’s very difficult.Alexander was always in contact, interested in the status of work at every stage.When the work came into foolishness, he wrote what was wrong and what was to be done, rebuilt, and gave time to fix everything.But in me in general there were some questions on terms, because in the description to the project was stated that there is a month, at the beginning of the work approved 20 days, taking into account all the checks, the right.But the theoretical and practical part was 2 weeks - 4-5 days for each section.This was in principle enough.But in fact, each section had to be given 1-2 days earlier.There was no real right, only with the last chapter there were problems and had to be processed completely, because not until the end was understood the setting of the task, which are the data to be taken for calculations, but that is already so.I didn’t like the form of communication.I don’t know at what point Alexander decided that we could communicate on “you”, because that moment we didn’t discuss.This is only my own impression.