Sergej Suworoff

I can’t say I’m 100% satisfied with the cooperation.The website audit project lasted almost two months.The reasons are several:
1 .The customer does not have a competent developer.The tasks that are carried out in a week, he did 2 weeks and that, half of the audit, of the important points did not.Infinite number of straight because of the developer’s negligence.In the Audit, there is a comment that is correct.I’m checking, and the error.And so in almost all points.It can be easy to say, "He was overwhelmed by other tasks - he didn't go."Not in the sense?You can say "I can't do it" and then after a preventive conversation with the Customer it is possible.For him, all these are toys, not serious.But for me it is a job.And working with such uncompetent and irresponsible programmers takes time - I'm not used to.There was no way out, I had to work.Greetings to Rust!2ndAfter complete checking the technical task on the test site, I was asked to check again everything I’ve already checked, but already on the battle.That is, to do again, unpaid work and spend more than an hour of time again.Usually, when working with competent programmers, they all transfer to the battle site correctly.But here is the programmer Rust.Therefore... sorry and ah... We had to spend an additional time checking the correctness of the transfer of the rectum from the test to the battle.Of course, I found no mistake.For example, the battle site had no robots.txt file - that is, the site could simply stop correctly indexing.And this is what Rust answered http://joxi.ru/zANwggvs88ZMVr (ups...just ups).Congratulations to Rust again!ThreeFrom all the above, it comes to the following.I performed an audit in eight days.Then he waited almost a month unknown what (until Rustam puts the directions).A lot of work around the circle.The processing.A great delay with the payment for the work done.With the Customer himself communicated little, mostly all the work was done through the project manager of the company, in general it seemed good.My advice, Sergey, is to run away from such a developer.Or, you need to attract the permanent seashnik, which will work with the site, notice the bugs and give to the correction.Because, even Rustam himself doesn’t know what new bugs he could be infected when introducing the rectangles from the audit.And when you invest no small money in SEO and the result will not be because for example the robots.txt file is unavailable, Rustam will simply say "UPS".I recommend to the manufacturers to work with the customer’s developer on the terms of hourly payment.For a fixed rate is a total loss on time spending, in this case.I recommend the customer!Rustam - dismissed )