Pavel Kostromitsky

Two sensations remained from the work with Paul.There were plus and minus.From the plus I want to note that the project was with a really interesting idea and a decent payment.The main disadvantage was the difficulties in communication.The Customer shall throw his line, ignoring any proposals for achieving the objective by any means other than those that are spoken by him.The example:
I’m developing an app on a server, the app works stable.The customer is trying to deploy the app on a local machine, and the app is not launched.The customer accuses me of saying “nothing works.”I pay attention to the customer to the fact that on the sold server the application is launched and works.This argument is not accepted.I suggest you go through the teamviewer and solve the problem.The proposal is also ignored.According to the customer, I had to find an inexistent error and correct it.At the same time, the app works stable on my local machine (windows7 + xampp), on the VPS test (CentOS + LAMP) and on the VPS sales (also CentOS + LAMP).I don't understand how the application can be considered NOT working if it's left on the Seller.I don’t understand how I can fix a mistake without accessing the middle where it is driving.On my part, I tried to close all the issues where problems could arise.He was ready to resolve any issues related to the project.To say, the project was closed after the described disagreement, despite my willingness to help and solve this problem.In general, I can’t say that I recommend or not recommend Paul as a customer.There were positive moments, but for me, the project turned to a very strong nerve and time loss (and therefore a lost benefit) in the right place.