Oleg Pol

This is our first collaboration, I have very pleasant impressions.
The task is written clearly and understandably, pleasant communication and quick responses.
I hope we will work together again.
I recommend Oleg 🙂

Thank you for the interesting project.
I recommend collaboration.

Oleg is a good customer, I recommend.
Thank you for cooperation

Good customer, clear TZ, quick answers to all questions. I will be happy to work further.

Everything went successfully. Working with Olga was a pleasure. I recommend

I think the collaboration with the customer Olga is very effective and mutually beneficial.
Work on the project was organized at the height: the customer, the expert himself, participated in the discussion of the details
the project, gave useful clarifications, valuable comments, and implement the project at the right level
quality and within the agreed time.
thank you.

Thank you for the interesting project and new experience) I will be glad to continue working with you.

Буду рада дальнейшему сотрудничеству!

Чётко поставленная задача. Все по-делу, просто и понятно. Быстрое принятие работы. Спасибо за заказ!

Thank you for cooperation! The customer sets the tasks. I recommend

The customer clearly and clearly set the tasks, was always in contact, made the payment in time and fulfilled all the obligations. We will continue to cooperate. I recommend !

Requirements are clearly and clearly prescribed. Payment is made in time. thank you. I recommend to everyone.

Comprehensive TZ, adequate requirements, instant payment. Cooperation with the customer is pleased. I recommend !

Thank you for your collaboration with Olga!In communication an adequate, quiet and positive customer.I don’t see any reason not to work with him.Honest pay, agreed to work through the seafood, meaning we work.It’s great, so 10.Why only 5 out of 10 for the task setting - as new tasks appeared during work (the draw of additional pages).In the task to the project was one volume of work, in the transaction another, it was not quite clear, but well.7 I can't say anything bad.Requirements of the customer, there are his requirements.There were some misunderstandings in technical matters from the customer.It is unpleasant that at this moment the executor is accused of being his miserable work.But it is not terrible, everything is discussed and resolved.According to the contact - more than a week could not wait for a response due to the customer's trip.Asking for an urgent answer.Speaking about the overflow, I think this is not very reasonable, because when the executor has to leave on his affairs and he warns as it was in our case, it is taken into account.With any difficulties with this did not arise, everything was given good and even given the originals ready for the moment of work.But everyone is forgotten that the project involves the participation of two parties.If there is no one, the project will take the same time.And the absence of customers, no one takes it into account.I comment on a few sentences of the customer: "In one word, we gave up the first ...",It creates the impression that the executive needs more than the customer.“The work was done long and negligently (not observed, not noticed, etc.).”When the work is performed, the natural process, which is complementary, directional and correctional.How to properly understand that "not seen and not noticed" I don't know, I don't understand."The desired result, can be said, reached by 70% and with a limit in 1.5 months" - as I think the customer sets the volume of work and decides whether it is done or not.Working through the seafood is not a cat in the bag is given by the executor and the customer knows how much percent the work is done and he will pay for it or not.In our case, like in all other successful projects through the seafood, the customer took the work and completed the project.What is described above is unclear.The deadline was written above.In any case, thank you for cooperation!The Success!