Nazarii Vykhrivskyi

The customer provided the link to the empty package initially.Then they were updated, leaving for all the time of cooperation open access to editing to everyone who will go through this link, which obviously interfered with the work.Having received the first version of the curve suddenly closed the project with a negative feedback, despite the fact that in the dialogue with it was agreed a period with the stock for a couple of days.I have been given directions, the project is implemented in accordance with the model.After I delivered the fully appropriate design of the layer within the time period they specified, and in the general letter I proposed to the arbitration to refuse the payment by passing the finished work, mentioning that it was much more important for me to remove the negative feedback, not matching the results of the work (I was tired of spending time on the unnecessary nervousness I didn’t stand these money, I have other projects enough), the customer suddenly began to insist on what he wants to leave about me this feedback.This is the case with the implemented project.With the artist is not considered, the defects from its side are not seen, the developer is not heard, conduct "dialogue" (if this can be called so) in a unilateral order.A complete constructive dialogue is refused.The framework of business ethics is not adjusted.During the time of cooperation he created a stable impression of himself as a angry/high in life person with a manicity of greatness, who is NOT important the result of work, but it is important somewhere to support someone's mood and insist in the soul.I do not recommend connecting.