Kirill Zh

I will start right away with the good because I recommend collaborating with this client. There are pros and cons, and the pros outweigh the cons. There are no perfect clients, just as there are no perfect performers. The high level of communication and flexibility in resolving issues tipped the scales towards recommending collaboration, but I cannot describe the cons. They are clear and may simply improve the understanding of task setting in the future. The volume of material relative to the basic terms of reference has doubled. After integrating specific formats of some files into the uniform structure of the entire project, it increased by 2.5 times. That is, from 500 photos, we received 1280 photos and videos. There was also a desire to create a kind of story on the map. The map shows a point moving, and photos appear. The task was clear, but I had to ignore it since there was a clear requirement from me for screenshots of maps linked to photos, and 90 percent of the material did not have this, which affected the complete deviation from the terms of reference and improvisation. Here, the client's advantages manifested, as they understood that there was a gap, and we changed the way of presenting the material to the one I chose. The biggest downside is trusting the performer to select important events among thousands of photos. I am a stranger; what is beautiful to me does not always have moral value for the client. For such a task, one needs to select 50-100 photos themselves and create a beautiful animated journey through the locations; then there will be success for both sides. But the good thing is that it ends well. I cannot give a maximum rating, but I also cannot say that the client is not worth attention.