The freelancer failed to meet all the requirements of the project brief. The first version of the article was written using AI tools, whereas the project brief clearly stated that the content must be unique. The rewritten article had no issues with uniqueness; however, it contained syntactical errors, many repetitions of phrases and ideas. The article also lacked references to trustworthy sources, which made the opinions unsubstantiated and generalized, lacking specificity and facts. The presentation of information was at times illogical, especially in transitions between sentences, paragraphs, and in the conclusion. Comments on the article were only partially taken into account. The rewriting of the content led to deadline extensions. We have no comments regarding the freelancer's communication culture.