In general, the guys do not work well.but:
1) A big problem with communication - a lot of excess time is spent because the guys, instead of reading carefully and immediately do the way I need, invent a bicycle and seek their way.However, this is characteristic for many young performers.2) The problem with the terminology used and, as a consequence, again with the communication: to understand that the phrases from the executive type "There links lead to all sites in the right resolution" actually mean (in this case the executive tries to say that the links on the site made by him are at all right, but you just need to change the file extensions from html to php), you need to make a lot of effort and patience.3) The executor tries to dispute on a fair place about what must enter into his work and what does not.However, this is also typical for many performers.4) Difficult to access: obviously, many projects are captured parallelly, and until a window is found in the hard work, the answers to the simplest questions have to wait for a few hours.However, these cats are paid for cheap services, so in the graph "Price" 10 out of 10.Short projects I’t trust, and for tasks with time reserves the guys are perfectly suitable.The main thing is control.(Work in the mode "doed a task and forgot before receiving the finished result in the specified time period" - not with this executor).
1) A big problem with communication - a lot of excess time is spent because the guys, instead of reading carefully and immediately do the way I need, invent a bicycle and seek their way.However, this is characteristic for many young performers.2) The problem with the terminology used and, as a consequence, again with the communication: to understand that the phrases from the executive type "There links lead to all sites in the right resolution" actually mean (in this case the executive tries to say that the links on the site made by him are at all right, but you just need to change the file extensions from html to php), you need to make a lot of effort and patience.3) The executor tries to dispute on a fair place about what must enter into his work and what does not.However, this is also typical for many performers.4) Difficult to access: obviously, many projects are captured parallelly, and until a window is found in the hard work, the answers to the simplest questions have to wait for a few hours.However, these cats are paid for cheap services, so in the graph "Price" 10 out of 10.Short projects I’t trust, and for tasks with time reserves the guys are perfectly suitable.The main thing is control.(Work in the mode "doed a task and forgot before receiving the finished result in the specified time period" - not with this executor).
Profile deleted
