The work was sent with a little delay (you can consider that the deadline was observed).
But the work itself was done without taking into account the required requirements.
The methodology provides a clear list of points that are needed. They are not in the work.
What is guided by the executive, sending such work and claiming that it meets the requirements - I don't understand (a little later I got the answer why so: there was little time. But agree that the clear list of requirements was known in advance).
I have believed the previous positive reviews.
Experience in writing economic practical works in the executive is unsuitable, unfortunately.
But the work itself was done without taking into account the required requirements.
The methodology provides a clear list of points that are needed. They are not in the work.
What is guided by the executive, sending such work and claiming that it meets the requirements - I don't understand (a little later I got the answer why so: there was little time. But agree that the clear list of requirements was known in advance).
I have believed the previous positive reviews.
Experience in writing economic practical works in the executive is unsuitable, unfortunately.
Profile deleted
