Написать курсовую на тему "Сплоченности коллектива"

The quality of work does not match
1 .Any proposal from the course is written with a reference.Such work cannot be passed because the work is checked for readability in all universities.2nd3 additions to which the author is referred are not present.(There is no comment)
ThreeThe conducted collective cohesion studies are completed (not even modified data)
ThreeReference to the list of literature is present only in the entry and in section #4 (starting from 22 pages of 30).4 .You sometimes write about the production that is missing in the DIP.MISSION as such.Deep Mission is not a factory.and 5.In the conclusion, the last phrase *proпозиции наведені вище* does not correspond to reality, *выще* nothing is listed.6 .To be honest, it creates the impression that the instructor’s recommendations sent by me before remained ignorant.(the number of pages in each section does not match the required, no phrases that the teacher wants to see in each section are used)
7 .The work in the Ukrainian language is present in Russian (no comment)

Time and contact at the worst level.Mary, I asked you, you can, write before the new year.But you assured me that you will write quietly until January 8th.On January 8, you came to the contact after lunch and wrote that I will be working on 9th chila after lunch.By the fact of the 9th day at 23:30 I wrote to you that this is not the order, and I got the answer "in 30 minutes the work will be."Yesterday I wrote to you about all the shortcomings of work - the answer is zero.

In the first came into such a situation, there was one disappointment from such a complication of events.She agreed to work on a safe deal, she went to a customer, who was afraid of her finances.This is generally in the order of things, if not but: I carefully fulfilled all her wishes on the work, counted all the details, came out to contact, but unfortunately there are very incomprehensible and unconscious customers.The essence is that I gave up the job for a day later than agreed, but I warned the customer about it before and she agreed.The customer said he would carefully read the work and answer at 13.00 the next day.In general, I came out to the contact at the given time and turned into misunderstanding:
The customer, until I was on the web, quickly asked the administration to return the reserved funds, motivating the fact that the work was delivered not in time and reading it "by diagonals" the customer decided that it was "written from the reference" (this is while Olga himself sent materials for work and gave links from the internet to the reference - asked to use them ).The owner of Barin, Olga.Additionally, according to the rules of the service I can write to the arbitration, within 5 days, so I did, but the administration has already finally made a decision and I have not even heard, because "the decision has been made."All good to you, Olga, I hope you have defended the course work well and spent the money I earned on good things.Since then, I’m unfortunate I can’t trust the “safe deal” because I’ve felt that it’s out of it.