I was very pleased to collaborate!

I especially want to highlight the quality of the provided technical assignment. It was presented exceptionally clearly, in detail, and understandably. Thanks to this, we were able to avoid any misunderstandings, save time on clarifications, and immediately focus on completing the tasks. This approach allowed us to organize the workflow as smoothly, effectively, and without unforeseen revisions as possible.

I truly enjoyed our interaction and the result. Communication throughout the entire project was quick and constructive. I sincerely recommend this client to other professionals as a reliable, organized, and professional partner who values time and quality.

5.0

Design of the page for a clinical psychologist and rehabilitation specialist
Personal 223 USD
The collaboration went very smoothly and pleasantly! The client formulates tasks very clearly, responds promptly, and always provides constructive feedback. The atmosphere in the project was comfortable, without any misunderstandings.

5.0

Phase 2. Main page GOTUIMO — structure, details, requirements
Personal 700 USD
I have worked with Serhiy before, this is already our third successfully completed collaboration. The client always clearly formulates tasks, provides a clear brief, examples, and explanations, so there is no confusion in the work. The requirements for the result are justified and adequate, corrections are always substantive and in a constructive form.

5.0

A good client.
The task took a bit longer, but this is a problem of the technology itself and its bugs.
Communication was quite fast, the person was knowledgeable about the questions they asked, so there were no difficulties.
Thank you for the collaboration.

5.0

Reciprocal Feedback
Analytical tool for cryptocurrency trading
Personal 267 USD
Working with Georgy was very comfortable and productive. The client demonstrated a high level of engagement, respected expert opinions, and provided the necessary autonomy while actively participating in discussions of important decisions. Deadlines were extended when necessary, which allowed for the quality completion of the work.
The collaboration was structured, with goals set step by step, metrics discussed, scenarios outlined, and system optimization addressed. The project was technically complex, but thanks to the collaboration, we were able to bring the bot to a stable state, with the possibility for further calibration and development.

I recommend Georgy as a professional and reliable client.

5.0

Design of envelopes for records
Personal 16 USD
The client was constantly in touch and listened to my vision. There were only minor technical misunderstandings. Overall, the collaboration was productive and interesting, and I hope for further cooperation. I recommend!

4.9

Reciprocal Feedback
Website assembly for redesign
Personal 234 USD
The client demonstrated responsibility and organization. The task is clearly formulated, the design layout is complete, communication is quick and constructive. The work on the layout and custom elements went smoothly without delays. I recommend for collaboration.

5.0

Create a 15-second video from templates
Personal 55 USD
Dissatisfied with the collaboration:
1) The client made significant changes to the initial task, and it was necessary to open another project in parallel for the revisions. The client refused to close this project until the revisions were made. New revisions appeared, then more and more, it seemed like it would be endless.
2) You submit revisions in the morning, and you might receive some reaction in a day or two. You immediately ask something, but you get a response the next day. The work is very long and tedious.
3) The client delayed the work and manipulated. The first revisions were evaluated, there was a separate project for them, but a bunch of additional revisions were added that should have been paid for, but the client refused to close any project and continued to send revisions. It happened that he said, "These are the last revisions, do them and we will close the project," but after the revisions were made, more revisions came in, and of course, no one closed the project. After some revisions, I submitted a video with watermarks. I had to say that I would contact arbitration, then the client said to give him the file without watermarks and he would close the project. I gave it. Of course, no one closed the project, and new revisions came in, meaning it was just a deception. I said that I would not make any more revisions until the project was closed and I would contact arbitration. The client closed the first project and supposedly all revisions were made, and the second project needed to be closed, but no, the client sent more revisions for the project with revisions) and insisted that I first accept the terms of the new (third project) for resizing the video, while previously refusing to close the previous project. While writing this review, I am doing this third project. Globally, nothing has changed in the work. Therefore, I am very dissatisfied, the experience is unpleasant.

3.1

Performing tasks on a tourist marketplace and assisting the operator.
Personal 535 USD
The workflow is always organized at the proper level. Responsibilities were clearly defined, communication with management is correct. I received my salary on time. A working and professional atmosphere is always maintained in the team.

5.0

It was easy and comfortable to collaborate, I received a clear and competent technical assignment. The client is open to ideas and ready to consider the task from different angles. Certainly, I will be happy to collaborate in the future.

5.0

It was very pleasant to collaborate with the client! Communication was at a high level — everything was clear, understandable, and timely. A nice person to communicate with, always open to dialogue. The project turned out to be large-scale and interesting. I hope for further collaboration!

5.0

Creation of a storyboard for the promotional video of the company ATAS
Personal 220 USD
The project went smoothly.
The technical specifications were clearly defined, and all necessary materials were provided on time. Communication was prompt and clear.
I look forward to working on future projects with Denis.

5.0

The collaboration was at a high level. The client clearly explained the task, provided all necessary materials, and quickly got in touch. The project in the iGaming theme turned out to be interesting and allowed for creativity to be expressed. Communication was pleasant and constructive, and the revisions were justified and appropriate.

5.0

Reciprocal Feedback