Latest reviews about clients

Thank you to the client for the work. I was always in touch even at night. I answered all questions, although there were times I asked a couple of times. Everything went well, we successfully completed the project!
I recommend for collaboration!

I’m fully satisfied with our collaboration. The brief was clear and detailed, which made the task easier to complete.
Although communication was occasionally delayed due to the time zone difference, it was never an issue for either of us.
I’d be happy to work together again in the future!

I do not recommend working with this client, I will explain why: here I will show a test of correspondence as the client gives the assignment, I simply copied his words and did not add anything
(I intentionally do not give references because I want to see how you feel the theme and if we are on the same wavelength. I am not looking for perfect execution, but for the vibe. I am interested in imagination, presentation, and creativity. I want to see how you interpret the idea, not a specific style.
I am ready to approve the test task on the conditions of 1800 UAH. This is a compromise that will allow us to test the work and understand if we are suitable for each other in style.
Waiting for confirmation.)

The agreement was for one version of a T-shirt print design, I provided 3 design options, the client did not like the designs, wanted me to do it in another style, I made edits to the design and provided 5 more options, the client again did not like everything, I asked for at least some examples and a description of how the design should look, to which the client gave me this vague answer (When I say "brand style" in the context of CMM, I mean: uniqueness that you want to wear. The print should look not like an illustration or emoji, but like a visual symbol of the brand.), no brand was provided as an example, based on this technical task you can make a million examples and none may be liked, the client wanted me to keep making designs endlessly until he liked something. I tried to get at least some information I could rely on, but the client did not provide it, after that I turned to arbitration, here is what the client wrote in arbitration.
(I appreciate the designer for the time spent, but I want to emphasize the key point:

Payment for the test task was not guaranteed.
The condition was — to provide your vision according to the general description of the brand. All further clarifications were part of communication, not a requirement for rework.

Payment depended on the result, which could potentially be used.
None of the proposed options (and there were 8) meet the stylistic level, quality, and visual concept of the brand. I clearly communicated this and provided detailed explanations to help align the style. The goal of the test task — to see how well the designer understands the brand style.

The designer's reaction in communication was emotional and passively aggressive, which unfortunately reduces the chances of further cooperation, regardless of the quality of the design.

Given this, I consider the test task not completed at a level that warrants payment.
I do not plan to use the results, the copyright remains with the designer.

I see that for you the issue of payment is a priority, so I am willing to pay part of the work — 800 UAH, which corresponds to the market level for a similar quality and engagement. The amount stated — 1800 UAH, implied a strong idea, branded implementation, and potential use of the print. Unfortunately, from the designer's side, there was not only a lack of compliance with the technical assignment but also a desire to endlessly create designs until something suited him.

I tried to get at least some information I could rely on, but the client did not provide it, after that I turned to arbitration, here is what the client wrote in arbitration.
(I am grateful to the performer for the time spent, but I want to emphasize the key point:

Payment for the test task was not guaranteed.
The condition was — to provide your vision according to the general description of the brand. All further clarifications were part of communication, not a requirement for rework.

Payment depended on the result, which could potentially be used.
None of the proposed options (and there were 8) meet the stylistic level, quality, and visual concept of the brand. I clearly communicated this and provided detailed explanations to help align the style. The goal of the test task — to see how well the designer understands the brand style.

The reaction of the performer in communication was emotional and passively aggressive, which unfortunately reduces the chances of further cooperation, regardless of the quality of the design.

Given this, I consider the test task not completed at a level that warrants payment.
I do not plan to use the results, the copyright remains with the performer.

I see that for you the issue of payment is a priority, so I am willing to pay part of the work — 800 UAH, which corresponds to the market level for a similar quality and engagement. The amount stated — 1800 UAH, implied a strong idea, branded implementation, and potential use of the print. Unfortunately, from the designer's side, there was not only a lack of compliance with the technical assignment but also a desire to endlessly create designs until something suited him.

I tried to get at least some information I could rely on, but the client did not provide it, after that I turned to arbitration, here is what the client wrote in arbitration.
(I am grateful to the performer for the time spent, but I want to emphasize the key point:

Payment for the test task was not guaranteed.
The condition was — to provide your vision according to the general description of the brand. All further clarifications were part of communication, not a requirement for rework.

Payment depended on the result, which could potentially be used.
None of the proposed options (and there were 8) meet the stylistic level, quality, and visual concept of the brand. I clearly communicated this and provided detailed explanations to help align the style. The goal of the test task — to see how well the designer understands the brand style.

The reaction of the performer in communication was emotional and passively aggressive, which unfortunately reduces the chances of further cooperation, regardless of the quality of the design.

Given this, I consider the test task not completed at a level that warrants payment.
I do not plan to use the results, the copyright remains with the performer.

I see that for you the issue of payment is a priority, so I am willing to pay part of the work — 800 UAH, which corresponds to the market level for a similar quality and engagement. The amount stated — 1800 UAH, implied a strong idea, branded implementation, and potential use of the print. Unfortunately, from the designer's side, there was not only a lack of compliance with the technical assignment but also a desire to endlessly create designs until something suited him.

I tried to get at least some information I could rely on, but the client did not provide it, after that I turned to arbitration, here is what the client wrote in arbitration.
(I am grateful to the performer for the time spent, but I want to emphasize the key point:

Payment for the test task was not guaranteed.
The condition was — to provide your vision according to the general description of the brand. All further clarifications were part of communication, not a requirement for rework.

Payment depended on the result, which could potentially be used.
None of the proposed options (and there were 8) meet the stylistic level, quality, and visual concept of the brand. I clearly communicated this and provided detailed explanations to help align the style. The goal of the test task — to see how well the designer understands the brand style.

The reaction of the performer in communication was emotional and passively aggressive, which unfortunately reduces the chances of further cooperation, regardless of the quality of the design.

Given this, I consider the test task not completed at a level that warrants payment.
I do not plan to use the results, the copyright remains with the performer.

This is already our second joint project with Alexander, and once again the work was flawless. During the execution, Alexander promptly provided feedback, was always in touch, and promptly made the necessary clarifications. The requirements were reasonable and appropriate for the scope of work, the communication atmosphere was friendly and constructive. I recommend Alexander as a reliable and responsible client: it is a pleasure to work with him and to confidently plan future projects.

It was a pleasure to work on the project — clear task, structured script, and pleasant communication. I really liked the topic about healthy eating and balance on the plate — both in work and in life, it is truly relevant. Glad to be part of such a project. I recommend collaboration!

Collaboration with Maksym Hora left only positive impressions. The task was clearly formulated, the technical assignment was thought out to the smallest detail, and the client himself was always in touch and promptly provided feedback. The project was technically complex (Google Places API, daily data updates, integration with Telegram bot), but thanks to constructive communication, all issues were quickly resolved and the working tool was implemented in a short time.

Excellent client!
The project is clearly described, tasks are set clearly and in detail. At all stages of communication — quick feedback and constructive comments. It was a pleasure to collaborate and implement an interesting task of collecting text information and voice-over using AI. I recommend working together!

Collaboration with the client Oleksandr left a pleasant impression

The project was interesting, and the technical task was clear and logical. During the work process, some clarifications arose, but the client was always in touch, responded promptly to questions, and helped resolve all issues.

Also, all my questions were answered clearly and precisely by Oleksandr, who tried to help as much as he could.
The only downside I can highlight was the lack of testing data.

Overall, the project was well organized, and the cooperation was comfortable. I recommend the client as a responsible and open partner for dialogue. If there is an opportunity, I would gladly work again.

We are working with Artem once again and every time everything is as clear as possible. Artem is always in touch, responds, consults, helps. Reacts very promptly. Extremely polite and friendly. With such a client, you can definitely work on a permanent basis, knowing that everything will be wonderful and calm!

I've had the pleasure of working with this client before, and once again it was a smooth and professional experience. Clear communication, timely feedback, and a respectful attitude throughout the project. I'm always happy to collaborate with returning clients like this — and I’d gladly work together again in the future!

Prepared the necessary document, answered clarifying questions. Natalia clearly formulated the technical assignment, always in touch. I definitely recommend her as a super responsible and decent Client! I will be glad to continue cooperation!

The project was conducted in an organized and coordinated manner. All details were clearly formulated, which allowed for quick orientation in the task and effective implementation of the solution. Communication was at a high level, and the result was achieved on time.

The collaboration on this project went very well. The task involved creating a scene that included assigning materials and textures (at least three materials), using at least three decals, and adding animation. All necessary assets and instructions were provided on time, which made the work much easier. Communication was clear and quick, allowing me to focus on completing the tasks. The project was well-organized and clearly described, which enabled me to execute it efficiently. I recommend working together!

Thank you very much for the project and for your humanity!
Everything is great with the project: clear task setting, prompt feedback, and constructive comments.
And I am especially grateful that you agreed to extend the deadlines when I broke my leg and couldn't work for a few days.
I look forward to continuing our cooperation!

Glib clearly described the task, was in contact throughout the entire process, and responded promptly to clarifications.
All corrections were agreed upon quickly, which allowed the project to be completed on time.
Very grateful for the opportunity to collaborate and I recommend Glib!