Distributing Matthew’s assessments for the work done, a little in confusion about how to dissolve them, because on the one hand the project had deadlines that were violated by the result, and in fact at the present moment the bot was not ready, the functionality of the bot that we talked about with Matthew was not written, but it is necessary to note that Matthew intentionally overturned the price of other freelancers to try to create something big.In the work it turned out that Matthew was completely unfamiliar with how such a bot should work and had to dedicate in all the internal logic of the bot, what with what and how it interacts, what the user can do, and what is not and the most important how, in general, I had to explain all the logic, I am a programmer (not python) and left here the application for the boom to see how much such a bot could cost, the price was pleased, surprised and decided to write the bot with the hands of others, although the piton I don't know, I study it, within the framework of personal development, for this time this bot would already have written himself, and the same Matthew in the course of writing the bot was angry that he took for him, as much more than he expected.Now about the good Matthew is in touch, he is willing to go to dialogue, young, ambitious sometimes it interferes with his work, but yet he is hardened, also his hardeness is manifested and in the solution of the question of his negligence if something forgets it corrects, adjusts, can work overnight, can write several bots simultaneously.Matthew is hard enough at work and his performance sometimes surprises.If we miss the timetables of the work then I can say that with Matthew you can work, I will also say that you need a check list and clearly prescribed the tasks that the bot should solve, if the project is big, it is necessary a writing plan so that Matthew does not jump from the function to the function, in the plan today can one function write, tomorrow another, and then return from the first to write it.As I said above, Matthew was intense, careful, careful to his work and to the writing of the code, but everything broke his forgotteness, but I suppose that this was a consequence of the fact that initially no check sheets were done, it was only "need to copy the functionality of this bot @bot" further we discussed how and what in the details should work, there were moments when Matthew something in the bot was re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-reSo it is worth mentioning the fact that Matthew this project was postponed on my request and made in the course of 2 weeks me another bot that I asked him to write, with the task he managed on the URA, there were small bugs that he quickly fixed and the bot worked properly for a few months.With that other bot I liked Matthew’s work, there was clearly defined the task and Matthew successfully dealt with the task.As for this project, it is closed, the bot is not yet written to the end, but it is in the final stage, Matthew promises that soon it will be completed, in the bot remains to realize multi-language and a couple of moments, then to test the bot on the bugs, unfortunately they rise, as some features of the bot were re-written, as a result suffering addictions and artifacts appear, in general Matthew's work if looking at the code and his ability to learn I like, Matthew is able to take for an unknown task and perform it, it also created the impression that Matthew is carefully trying to write the code effectively, so that it does not feed the copypad, packing the logic into the function, encourages them and uses it again, it is very pleased to write the code to the module.Again, if we miss the deadlines of execution, then in general Matthew is satisfied with the work, after he will finish the work on this bot there are plans to work with him yet, taking into account the errors made in this project in interaction with Matthew.
