Thank you for cooperation! It was a pleasure to work with you.
The customer by points explained the task, provided the TZ and all the necessary materials and information for the work. Soon there was a feedback on questions. I received the payment immediately after checking. I will be glad for further cooperation.

I agreed with Eugen on a test task for payment. Everything is clear and clear. I had no claim before my job. Payment is rapidly.
I recommend cooperation.

Unfortunately, I had to “cooperate” with the given “contractor”.The person is absolutely not oriented in his own makeup: the color (inserted in the makeup) - "not similar", the image - "bad", the font - "someone other", placed an absolute element - "not beautiful" and so in 90% of the work.It was constantly needed to work straight to like it (but in the makeup this was not near).The model presented on 1920rh and 390rh - "shares on other devices, not beautiful, bad", the adapter - "bad, not as in the model" (although the models with other extensions were not).On the justified arguments does not react objectively, adequate images for other (smaller) extensions did not provide.Seeing that all the data is taken from the model (I even provided screenshots with color coding for comparison), I rarely agreed, and, as a rule, I wrote only "bad, different from the original."At the stage of discussion it didn’t sound “PixelPerfect”, and the customer requested it.In addition, I was accused of deleting his messages in a messenger, in which the work was carried out: "I wrote, I remember exactly, but I can't find."To tolerate such a attitude to myself has not become a force, so I have made a decision to stop the implementation of the project, since there was no visible end in it, and the nervous system is more expensive (although the layer is completely completed).