Andrey Zerny

The client was always in touch, clear terms of reference. The collaboration was smooth and productive, communication was quick and pleasant. I recommend for cooperation!

As always, everything is good! I recommend for collaboration, clear specifications, always in touch!

Cool client, understood that I totally missed the project deadlines. Clear task setting - definitely recommend for collaboration.

The task was clearly formulated, all materials provided. Always available, promptly provides feedback. I recommend collaboration!

The client was always in touch, open to discussion. The technical task was correctly set, and we were able to achieve the goals in this project.
I recommend the client for cooperation!

Clear technical task, timely feedback!
I recommend collaborating!

We are not working for the first time — everything is clear, coordinated. Tasks are understandable, payment is on time. I recommend as a reliable client!

We have been working together for a long time — always clear tasks, prompt communication, and a pleasant interaction. I recommend collaborating!

Clear technical task, timely feedback. Communication is at a high level, all requests were clearly formulated.

The client clearly formulated the task, was in touch, and provided feedback quickly. I recommend for collaboration!

The collaboration was easy and pleasant! The task was clearly formulated, always in touch. A client you want to work with again!

Always in touch, clear technical task. I recommend as a responsible client!

The client was always in touch, the technical task was clearly defined, I recommend for collaboration!

We are collaborating for the first time, clear specifications, always in touch, I recommend for cooperation!

The first stage is completed. We continue our collaboration.

The client was always in touch, open to discussion. The technical specifications were set correctly, and we were able to achieve the goals set in this project.
I recommend the client for collaboration!

The client was always in touch, open to discussion. The technical specifications were set correctly, and we were able to achieve the goals set in this project.
I recommend the client for collaboration!

The client was always in touch, open to discussion. The specifications were set correctly, and we were able to achieve the objectives set in this project. The project was completed according to the specifications with some adjustments. I recommend the client for collaboration!

Always in touch, provides a clearly formulated technical task, responds promptly to questions.

The client approached with a project regarding the setup and management of advertising in Google Ads. During the process, difficulties arose: the client systematically did not replenish the advertising account, which complicated achieving stable results. Despite the conversions obtained, the client claimed that there were no results, but did not provide specific feedback on this. Communication was irregular, and the client could disappear for several days, which slowed down the work process.

I recommend clarifying the details of the collaboration and ensuring regular communication before starting the project.

Good Client.
I recommend.

Clear project brief, always in touch, I recommend for collaboration!

We changed the concept of the parser a bit: instead of a table that parsed products, we switched everything to a panel that does the same thing. The table is not very logical because it will eventually run out, and you still need a UI where you need to modify this table. It takes three days to write the panel, and everything else would just be the table itself.

The client has an assistant with whom everything can be discussed, and she checks everything. It's quite a good bonus because she acted as a tester, relieving me of some workload since the project has dragged on a bit — I underestimated the complexity of the project a bit. I am more used to working hourly, where you don't have to guess how long it will take to do this or that.

Pros of the client:
- Made concessions.
- Has an assistant.
- Quite a large company.

Cons of the client:
- Does not delve into the project.
- Does not appear online often.
- Need to communicate via phone or voice.
- Need to communicate in Viber — I don't really like this messenger, it's a bit outdated and inconvenient. It's more pleasant in Telegram.

We agreed with the client on supporting the parser after the project due to micro-bugs that are quite difficult to test because products are parsed once a day. This means that you need to look for a bug once a day and then fix it, and so on every day. The assistant handles this.

Well, in principle, it's quite a large company, they could have paid a bit more. But okay, I set the budget and so on. You can work with the client, but a detailed technical specification is needed, and more communication with the assistant is required. The assistant responds quite quickly to messages, and you can have a dialogue with her regarding the project topic.

Everything is fine. I am satisfied with the cooperation.

I recommend cooperation. 10 out of 10

My recommendations were quickly resolved. clearly provided t.
I recommend Andrea as a responsible customer.

Все хорошо, рекомендую к сотрудничеству

Honestly, according to agreement