Switch to English?
Yes
Переключитись на українську?
Так
Переключиться на русскую?
Да
Przełączyć się na polską?
Tak
  1. Freelancers

Daria K.

Sleeping face
Daria hasn't been on the service for a while.
But on Freelancehunt, there are also 9155 freelancers in category Copywriting, who will professionally and timely complete a project of any complexity.

Germany Germany
1 year back
Available for hire available for hire
on the service 2 years
Freelancer Daria K. — Germany. Core skill — Copywriting, Rewriting

Rating

Successful projects
No data
Average rating
No data
Rating
80

Skills and abilities

Translation

Writing

Portfolio


  • Translation into Russian topic philosophy

    Text Translation
    Cosmological arguments highlight a certain common feature of the universe, such as its randomness, and claim that this feature supports the existence of God. The Kalam cosmological argument (KCA), originally developed by Muslim theologians, focuses on the apparent finitude of the universe, asserting that this implies the existence of a first cause. There are two main variants of Kalam: one variant, supported by William Lane Craig, claims that the universe is finite in time. The other variant, supported by Alexander Pruss, advocates for causal finitism (the thesis that any causal chain must be finite). Craig's Kalam derives the existence of a cause for the universe from its temporal finitude by using some causal principle, such as "everything that begins to exist has a cause." Comparatively, Pruss's Kalam has quicker arguments for the existence of a first cause; however, to show that this first cause has divine attributes, this Kalam often also ultimately relies on various causal or linking principles. In either variant of Kalam, there are three main areas of dispute: (i) is the universe truly finite in the sense claimed, (ii) is the relevant causal or linking principle convincing, and (iii) is the derived first cause an example of any of the traditional divine attributes? Key works The original Kalam of Craig is most thoroughly outlined in Craig's work (1998), and a modern defense is presented in Craig and Sinclair (2009). Craig's Kalam uses philosophical and scientific arguments in favor of the finitude of time: Copan & Craig 2017 is a remarkable anthology of essays critiquing and defending philosophical arguments for the finitude of time, while Craig & Copan 2017 is an anthology of scientific arguments for the finitude of time. Pruss's Kalam is most thoroughly developed in Pruss 2018, as well as Koons 2014. Most objections and discussions of Pruss's Kalam are based on an objection developed in §3 Shackel 2005, or revolve around it. Another source of objections against Kalam in a more general sense has been that its arguments for finitude can be parodied as (implausible) arguments for a finite future; see Cohen 2015 for parodies of Kalam in general and Schmid, forthcoming, for parodies of Pruss's Kalam. Introductions For a good overview of Craig's Kalam, see Reichenbach 2004, particularly §7. For an overview of recent work on Kalam and some subvariants not mentioned here, see McIntosh 2022, particularly §2.
  • 5 USD

    Translation of texts into Russian, Ukrainian, English, Polish

    Text Translation
    translation of texts of any nature and quantity, price negotiable.
  • 7 USD

    Перевод на английский и с английского

    Text Translation
    Переведу с русского, украинского, польского и немецкого

Activity

  Latest proposals 2
Transcribe audio conference calls
21 USD
Copywriter
20 USD