Oleksandr Zhivotkov

Everything was done on time and according to the agreements.

A programmer certainly knows how to code, but to achieve results, one must work hard... The start of the work was promising, but then enthusiasm waned. We, of course, completed the task, but the path to this was not the smoothest. I think for an experienced team lead or senior, he will be a suitable performer, but for a beginner or amateur client, the collaboration may turn out to be challenging.

Unfortunately, the project was completed extremely poorly. The main problems:

1. The code was written without considering scalability and optimization. A large amount of duplicate code complicates maintenance and expansion.
2. The solutions used are ineffective and do not meet modern development standards. For example, there is no modular structure, the code is not organized into functions or classes, and the logic is scattered throughout the project.
3. There is no documentation or comments in the project, making understanding and modifying the code practically impossible.
4. The requested functions are implemented superficially and do not meet the stated requirements. Many of them have errors or do not work at all.

Moreover, the contractor did not show initiative in correcting the mentioned problems and clearly did not strive to complete the project at a decent level.

Attachment: Files confirming the above-mentioned problems are attached to the project.

The work was done well. The contractor was in touch. He promptly corrected the comments.

The work was completed on time and clearly, everything was liked, thank you for the craftsmanship!

The project was done according to my assignment. There were many revisions, but Alexander was always in touch and immediately implemented all the requests for improvements during the process. In the end, everything turned out as I wanted.