The work was done, all the necessary directions were made, worked until they made the design as identical as possible.At the level of the layer at a good average level, although sometimes there were errors and something in the layer landed or ceased to work as needed when I indicated it, the developer corrected.Indeed an unpleasant moment - that the deadlines worked very long, and all the promises about the deadlines were broken, from the initial 10 days that the developer indicated, the result was done only a month later (or even a little longer).Per, in 10 days it was really difficult to perform the whole volume of work, but in 15, I think it’s quite, as this deadline was specified by the developer, I think it shouldn’t be so, and the transfer of the deadline was a few, and then the deadlines were “conditional” and the deadlines we didn’t talk about.The two people worked on the project.There was still a moment when the customer asked for a 70% prepaid, although the work until the end was not yet done, this is a single case, but since they worked through the seafood and the developer's payment was guaranteed, and I could stay with the project not finished until the end - also not a very pleasant moment.Overall, again, I want to say that at the technical level, especially if the person himself noticed and corrected such big errors when the hat in the layer became different color, when the page in the mobile version was moving right-to-back, it was done well.If such errors were verified by the developer himself, the line would pass much faster, and I didn’t have to spend so much time, just to indicate a gross error or disagreement with the original design.And I still want to note that the project was not one of the simple, for which it is necessary to give the developer the right, since not every person simply agreed to this work, because of the uncertainty that it will be able to deal with.The developer can be trusted and granted projects, but you need to check the result if you want to a good result level.
