Design of the site

Probably the only positive point is contact.
On December 7, he took the project, and 15 said he was going on a vacation on December 25, for 1.5 months.Judge yourself.I was guilty of not providing the structure, although I didn’t even take the slides that could already be performed, everything was consulted with someone.I asked to return the prepaid because Alexander himself refuses to perform during his vacation.He said that it was a non-sens and the prepaid never returned.It continued that the deadlines we didn’t discuss and doesn’t understand where I’m hurrying, I can, please, and a month to wait.Somewhere at the end the conscience woke up and Alexander sent a message that he was ready to return 50% of the prepaid, but after 20 minutes the conscience drowned, and the message he deleted.I did not continue the dialogue anymore.I tried to find an alternative and suggested to perform the main site drawing.
The way of communication is very rough, example:
* is good.I'm picking a painting on the main page but after the vacation, because now there's no longer time.In five days I will not do it anyway.
You have to understand that.Or do you do not think of the western measures?Do you prefer someone to pull out your brains, legs, and anything but to a time that you didn’t talk about at first?The ?I didn’t find myself on the moyck, so I chose myself a freelancer’s luck.* The

I swear.He paid 100, spent 3 weeks in vain, another few days he listened to the grief, the money did not return.From the positive:
1) Judging by communication, Alexander knows much in the case.I read 2 books on design psychology and Alexander caused the impressions of a person who understands his case.(for professionalism put such an assessment 50% knowledge of the case 50% communication mode)
2) Very contacted, always responds to messages