I recommend Paul, as a good faithful, a specialist who tries to insight as deeply as possible into the TZ in order to give the expected result as accurately as possible.
I liked that Paul was on the contact all the time, showing intermediate results every day, and responding correctly to the comments of intermediate tests.
Separately I want to note the high level of tolerance when adjusting some points of the TZ "in the summer" (sometimes in the process of performing the work occurs to detect accurate inaccuracies)
I put 9 out of 10 on the quality of work because I feel the potential and I am confident that Paul can show himself even better.
I put 9 out of 10 on the same professionalism, for the same reasons. I liked that Paul in the summer had the moments of coding that he had never met before.
- 10 by cost, because he knows how to correctly assess the cost of work based on the requirements. That is, understands the reasonable balance of the price and work ratio.
- 10 on contact and deadlines already explained above.
I liked that Paul was on the contact all the time, showing intermediate results every day, and responding correctly to the comments of intermediate tests.
Separately I want to note the high level of tolerance when adjusting some points of the TZ "in the summer" (sometimes in the process of performing the work occurs to detect accurate inaccuracies)
I put 9 out of 10 on the quality of work because I feel the potential and I am confident that Paul can show himself even better.
I put 9 out of 10 on the same professionalism, for the same reasons. I liked that Paul in the summer had the moments of coding that he had never met before.
- 10 by cost, because he knows how to correctly assess the cost of work based on the requirements. That is, understands the reasonable balance of the price and work ratio.
- 10 on contact and deadlines already explained above.
