The collaboration left an extremely negative impression. The performer not only failed to meet all deadlines, providing no results, but also committed gross violations of platform rules and ethics.
On the platform, communication is handled by a "curator" with a good rating and attractive prices, but immediately after the start, a completely different person appears on Telegram. As it turned out, this is a low-skilled technician who has no relation to the profile on the site and lacks the necessary skills.
The main problem is that the actual performer did not familiarize themselves with the technical assignment at all. Because of this, they were unable to implement the basic requirements that had been discussed and approved before the work began.
Since the performer did not know the technical assignment, they began to demand additional payment for features that were already included in the initial budget. This looked like an attempt to artificially inflate the price during the work process.
Due to the incompetence of the technical staff and chaos in communication, the project was not delivered on time. By the established deadline, I received zero results.
When it came to support, the performer began to openly distort facts and manipulate data from our correspondence, trying to evade responsibility and keep the funds for uncompleted work.
In summary: You are dealing not with a professional, but with an "agency intermediary," where the curator only sells services, and the actual performers are unable to even read the technical assignment.
Save your time and stay away!