Design of a cosmetic equipment catalog
Personal 106 USD
The work on the catalog went very smoothly and harmoniously. The client provided a clear technical assignment, responded quickly to messages, and was open to constructive suggestions. All communication was clear and pleasant. The project was completed without unnecessary delays, and payment was received on time. I recommend for collaboration!

5.0

Wonderful client!

From the very first minutes, it became clear in which direction to move — the technical assignment was drafted extremely briefly, yet surprisingly clearly. The project turned out to be incredibly engaging, and mutual understanding was achieved literally with half a word. Everything went remarkably smoothly and promptly.

Communication was not only productive but also genuinely pleasant — the client was always in touch, which made the collaboration even more comfortable. I confidently recommend this wonderful professional!

5.0

The collaboration went wonderfully! The task was clearly defined, which greatly facilitated the work process. Pleasant communication and prompt feedback made the work comfortable and productive. I was glad to collaborate and hope for further cooperation in the future! ✨

5.0

Development of infographics for presentation
Personal 29 USD
Thank you for the collaboration! Igor is a creative and imaginative client, actively concerned about the project and looking for the best joint implementation of ideas, open to dialogue and the creative process. I look forward to future interesting tasks. I recommend.

5.0

Web
Personal 89 USD
Collaboration with Oleg is very difficult because the client does not fully know what he wants; he needs everything done very quickly.
Sunday 09.03.2025
We agreed on completing 3 points from my side, an appendix, by 24:00 on the same day the project started, that is, within 3 hours; I completed it in 2 hours, and Oleg postponed the review to the next day. The next day it started:
It is necessary to do what was not described at the beginning of the project; Oleg began to say that it needs to be redone because he does not understand what exactly was changed in the code, although everything works correctly; we agreed that I would write comments in the code.
Then Oleg did not like that to fix one of the points, I needed to add 4 lines of code.
After that, Oleg said he could not close the project because, according to him, a bug arose during my modifications and that he was closing the project as incomplete and turning to arbitration. I said I would review the commit history; if it was my fault, I would fix it. Oleg realized that his attempts not to pay for the project were failing, and he began to say that he had a different database connection configuration. I asked him to reset it, to which he said the next day that he did not know how to reset it. Then he responded 3 hours after each of my messages trying to find out if it was my problem. When it became clear that the bug he was accusing me of existed before I started, the client began to talk about me transferring the changes to another repository. He tried by all means to dig into something to avoid closing the project, responding every day or two. This dragged on until 17.03.2025; on Monday, Oleg closed the project when I said I was turning to arbitration because the project review time had dragged on.

I do not recommend this client; this is his second account on the platform, the previous one was blocked for violating platform rights.

If you decide to work with him, discuss everything upfront before collaboration, and be prepared for Oleg to want to take your work without paying you for it.

1.0

SigmaTrend UI
Personal 500 USD
I really enjoyed working on this project — it was interesting, well thought-out, and the communication was great. I sincerely apologize for the delay on my part, but I'm very grateful to the client for their understanding and willingness to extend the timeline. It was a pleasure to work on this, thank you!

5.0

Logo
Personal 40 USD
It is very pleasant to collaborate again with such a wonderful client! The work was organized clearly, the technical task was understandable, quick feedback, and always friendly communication. I recommend as a reliable and responsible client!

5.0

New company
Personal 45 USD
Thank you Oleg for the inquiry and the joint project! Oleg provided a clear list of questions he wanted answers to, so the consultation was also structured and informative ) I wish Oleg success in developing his own business! )

5.0

Landing page layout
Personal 45 USD
Working with Maxim was quite straightforward. He clearly articulated the project requirements and provided all necessary mockups. Communication was prompt, and he responded quickly to messages. During the work, he did not interfere with the development process, which allowed for a certain freedom of action. However, the final assessment of the work turned out to be quite critical. Maxim brought in his frontend developer for a review, who identified discrepancies with the mockup. Payment was made for the actually completed part of the work without delays, despite the decision not to continue the collaboration.

Pros of working with the client:

Clear technical assignment
Quick responses to questions
Timely payment

Recommendation: Before starting work, it is advisable to agree on acceptance criteria and possibly practice more frequent interim checks to align with expectations.

5.0

Collaboration with Juergen Lambrecht left exclusively positive impressions.
The client clearly formulated the task, promptly provided all necessary materials, and was always available for clarifications.
Juergen Lambrecht is a responsible and decent client, with whom it is pleasant to work. I recommend him to other freelancers without hesitation!

Rating: 10/10.

5.0

# Translation to English (professional style)

I am compelled to express extreme dissatisfaction with the collaboration with this client. It is extremely regrettable to have wasted time and resources. The task was to translate video material from Romanian to Ukrainian.

The problem arose because the client, having absolutely no understanding of the context of the video material, insisted on a completely different interpretation of the content.

I will provide a specific example: in a fragment where the speaker expresses concern ("I am still worried about this, no") and gives a brief description of a young person: "Once, a person, young, healthy, strong" (original Romanian: "Vreodată, un om, un tânăr, cabradu, puternic"), after which there is a short question: "Arrest?".

In this specific situation, after describing the young man as young and strong, but at the same time homeless and illiterate, Speaker 1 asks about a possible arrest, to which he receives a clear answer: "Nothing" (in Romanian "Nimic"). This answer unequivocally refutes the assumption of a criminal past. The speaker clearly indicates that the young man's problems are related to illiteracy and lack of housing, not legal violations.

The video material that was translated is available at the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqxFIgd5Gr4 (time segment 17:58), where the phrases "Areșt?" and "Nimic" can be clearly heard, which literally means "Nothing [happened]" or "There was no arrest" — a direct denial of the fact of an arrest.

It is worth noting that the client was provided with a complete transcript of the original text in Romanian, broken down minute by minute, from the beginning to the end of the video material. However, despite the availability of this documentation, the client made no effort to verify the context (even from the provided original) and continued to insist on their incorrect interpretation of the video's content.

There were many similar cases of improper understanding. I categorically do not recommend collaborating with this client. Such an experience leads to excessive psychological stress, creates an extremely negative impression of professional interaction, and, above all, may end with an unjustified negative review from a person who completely ignores the factual context of the video material, inventing their own interpretation and unjustifiably insisting on its correctness.

2.8

Thank you for the collaboration.

But there was a significant lack of feedback on the applications; from our side, the applications are submitted at a normal price, but there was no feedback from the client. We reminded about this several times, but only at the end of the collaboration did the client write that the applications were of poor quality. Why couldn't this have been communicated right away? We were working completely blind. Also, later, when the collaboration was coming to an end, they asked why we didn't say anything about where we were directing traffic, even though we had previously sent the strategy for approval - https://prnt.sc/Syf3xidQXZFS

4.5

Сподобалась співпраця із даним замовником, все дуже швидко і чітко було організовано.
ЯкіснеТЗ. Замовник швидко відповідав та вчасно переходив із етапу до завершення.
Дякую за співпрацю! Рекомендую до співпраці іншим!)

**************************
I liked the cooperation with this customer, everything was organized very quickly and clearly.
High-quality technical task. The customer responded quickly and moved from stage to completion on time.
Thank you for your cooperation! I recommend cooperation to others!)

5.0