We worked with this client on two projects with a similar theme. This is the second one. The project discussion went better than the first time, and communication improved. The deadline was set longer, I completed the work earlier, but the payment for the project was made only at the end of the deadline, as the client thought that a third party would provide edits to the work, which is good for me. That's what a deadline is for)) I'm all for working on more projects.

We worked with this client on two projects with a similar theme. This is the first one.
The client is generally good, but we need to figure out how the website and projects work a bit. Do not ask the executor: how everything is paid, which buttons to press, and what to do when the executor has done their job, the project deadline has passed, but there is a third party that needs to provide revisions. There was nothing about the third party in the initial terms of reference, so there was a bit of a problem in this regard. In terms of work - everything is good, everything was resolved, everything was done. Maintaining contact with the client is a bit challenging, but it should be understood from the very beginning that such moments exist and will occur when working with people. The payment for the first project was delayed by the client. In my opinion, all the downsides I mentioned above happened only due to the client's lack of experience using the service.
In the end - we found common ground in executing the work, agreed on the deadlines for the next project and other matters. If there is an opportunity to work together again, I will by no means refuse.