In order not to be voiced when leaving a negative feedback, I will describe in detail how the cooperation went, if it can be called so.Before the start of the work, there were clear instructions: "The work must be performed strictly according to the requirements and according to the methodology."The payment was agreed to be paid by the so-called "demo version".Before I started work I asked for data for quick contact - Tatiana gave me his mail.At the time limit, Tatiana removes screenshots (on which little can be understood), AP checking reports and requests (griven card and kiwi).Together with screenshots there was a promising message: "60 pages came out, according to an anti-plagiate.by R 72%.In the study of 2 groups of children, practice is more than theory as you indicated.This is the demo work.There are many tables and diagrams in the work.”We make the payment immediately, attach the check screen, but Tatiana sends the job only from the morning to the next day, relying on the fact that she only received the payment at night.And I will note that on screenshots I saw breaks between the text, so I asked Tatiana to remove them.In the morning, when I got the long-awaited document, I checked it for originality.And what was my surprise when the percentage was 46.In the task it was indicated that "Diploma is divided into theoretical part (it accounts for 25% of the entire graduate work) and the practical part (it accounts for 75%)".In the job I got they were 50% to 50%.Though above Tatiana wrote that practice is more than theory.All of these comments I wrote to her, what I got the answer, that "On account of the uniqueity, I did a check yesterday, before sending.I can’t check it from the phone now, I’m going to get to the computer – I’m going to do the analysis.”I never waited for this check for three days.Accordingly, I couldn’t give up the job in this way and waited for Tatiana, who had a weekend.Finally, we reached the fact that the customer is already defended, and the work is not yet.I was forced to remove what was.On the same day, the manager received comments.The second chapter was one group of people, not two.Also in practice were described for a reason children in speech violation, and the theme of the work "Forming a small motoric of the fingers of the hands in pre-school children with ZPR when preparing hands for writing."The introduction indicated a program that was not in operation.I received and checked the originality - 56%.And the comments from the teacher in the red color simply changed to black.After leaving this work, Tatiana immediately left the site.After a while, we called the Kiwi number.She raised her sister's tube and said she refused to give any data, and Tatiana was not at home.Understood that waiting for a normal job from Tatiana is not worth it and it is nothing but fraud I asked for a part of the amount she did not work.At that time, Tatiana assured that she was going to do the job.Tatiana got in touch after a while and began to prove that she had incomprehensible remarks (photo of remarks I add).Tatiana sends the work this time with the originality exactly the same and in the work again the ONR.And under the conclusion the work is not accepted from the customer - I remove comments.9 days ago Tatiana wrote that she would go to the city and do what she would come.I waited until today.DeLine was on the 29th.All words to one I can confirm with screenshots, letters (to which, to the post, I never got a reply at this time)
The result: 4,000 rubles lost and time lost
The result: 4,000 rubles lost and time lost
