Адвоката в гражд и арбитр процессе. Судебная практика
18 USDТип работы: _________ ВКР_______________
Требования ____ есть ____________________
Содержание _____ есть, вышлю в переписке ____
Кол-во стр - ________60-70 страниц_________
Уникальность -__________ 70%____________
Язык написания____рус.__________________
Work results
Client's review of cooperation with Tatyana Vorona
Адвоката в гражд и арбитр процессе. Судебная практикаTatiana commissioned the work earlier and thought she was a responsible author.But it turned out that it wasn’t so.I have just a shock.In the dialogue of the previous order was discussed the content of the work, the screen above.Also in the requirements of work, it was indicated to write the unique in 70%, in the work only 11% of the unique.When I called Tatiana, she told me that she was not able to solve the situation and that there was no content in the letter of this order and that she decided to write the work on another content.But the content was in the correspondence of another order and I naturally could not think that Tatiana would write the work not on the content that was already discussed, but can be said stupidly downloading the work from several works.Because it is no other way to call it, because in the work only 11% unique!!!The !In addition, for the first time, Tatiana broke the timing of writing work, and I had to wait another week to work.The question wanted to be resolved in the morning, but Tatiana said she was at work and could speak only in the evening.But I have to give my work on May 24 and I have to know that this work will be done, and Tatiana didn’t give me these guarantees of the work.When I called Tatiana again, she didn’t take the phone and then turned it off.It is just terrible.
Freelancer's review of cooperation with Olga Tilikina
Адвоката в гражд и арбитр процессе. Судебная практикаI do not recommend cooperation. The customer has completed three projects. All three times Olga has constantly changed the conditions of cooperation in the process of cooperation itself - the number of pages, the required uniqueity, the number of authors, etc. At the same time, the payment was made almost a month and a half after the implementation of the projects (one time it had to wait for it at the metro for an hour, but it never came). With what the customer itself is very impatient - it requires to put the deadlines shorter, respond instantly and is harassed. I’m not responding at work... When I’m tired, I got a negative feedback about cooperation. In the future, I will be more carefully choosing customers and not going to give up. The lessons are paid!