Preparation 1C
Personal
90 USD
Uncertainty remains after work.Initially the project was placed as publicly available, there were many proposals and to bring his thought he held a video meeting on which a visible example showed what I want to get in the final result.Alexander was one of the candidates for work.After considering the proposals I determined by the amount and examples of candidates, Alexander's rate was higher, but he insisted on the work and agreed to implement the project under my budget.
The terms, the area of work, the deadlines.And Alexander proposed to make an individual project.Alexander was a moderator, invited a programmer who worked.Everything went well until they didn’t give up.It turned out that Alexander didn’t fully understand the amount of work – the task was “Wigging accounts” and Alexander understood how “Wigging accounts on the Customer” and the account on the supplier he did not.For a trade organization, one without the other does not interact.Why so he could think - the example he line presentation was held on the accounts on the customer, other applicants asked the question on the accounts of the suppliers, Alexander was not - so so he decided
One word after that began long correspondence from Alexander to show that he does everything right and for the completion of the work it is necessary to make a supplement.I think it’s not very professional, even if that’s the case.For me, as a customer, it is not important to identify the situation, but the final work result.The supplement was agreed and it turns out that the project was completed at the cost that Alexander originally wanted.It may have succeeded, and may be a reason to solve the task for the initial amount by manipulation.
The result is that the programmer who did the job worked well, and the approach of Alexander I didn’t like.I will make the assessment average.The programming has drawn the project
The terms, the area of work, the deadlines.And Alexander proposed to make an individual project.Alexander was a moderator, invited a programmer who worked.Everything went well until they didn’t give up.It turned out that Alexander didn’t fully understand the amount of work – the task was “Wigging accounts” and Alexander understood how “Wigging accounts on the Customer” and the account on the supplier he did not.For a trade organization, one without the other does not interact.Why so he could think - the example he line presentation was held on the accounts on the customer, other applicants asked the question on the accounts of the suppliers, Alexander was not - so so he decided
One word after that began long correspondence from Alexander to show that he does everything right and for the completion of the work it is necessary to make a supplement.I think it’s not very professional, even if that’s the case.For me, as a customer, it is not important to identify the situation, but the final work result.The supplement was agreed and it turns out that the project was completed at the cost that Alexander originally wanted.It may have succeeded, and may be a reason to solve the task for the initial amount by manipulation.
The result is that the programmer who did the job worked well, and the approach of Alexander I didn’t like.I will make the assessment average.The programming has drawn the project
