Лендинг на Тильде
223 USD
Hi, I want to attach a video screen of the correspondence with this artist and get an objective assessment of his incompetence:
1 .TZ was sent out, the executive clarified a couple of questions, the brief did not give, I wrote how I imagine it, what I began to rush with the payment on the card.When I said that through the site it was safe - they began to talk about the commission and "I don't want to lose %", but still with the bad half formed through the site.2ndIn the final discussion before payment it was revealed that examples of sites (includingAnimations), presented as their own works, "have been done with some programmes", although for the work I clarified whether exactly all the works presented in the portfolio are the performers, which was an approved answer (the video screen of the correspondence in the telegram would also like to attach)
ThreeI asked to make a video as on the site-example, which was also the answer "Oh, I can't find someone else on the video", although the order was placed directly with this subpoint.4 .Also before the payment I proposed again to go on all the questions, what was the answer"the main went, all ok", but after the payment I was told that, it turns out, for the second language you need to pay 1000 UAH (ATHER, OPT-TAKY visible on the map), although on the site-example was just 2 languages. Well, ok, I thought, although already here an unpleasant doubt lurked, as if the performer did not specify this on purpose, but wrote that we would discuss it in more detail later.
5. I also wrote and reminded, painted the same questions 3-4 times (apparently it was difficult for the performer to look a little higher in the correspondence), the mobile version is still not ready
6. At the end of the second week (a period of a week was promised), the performer suddenly declares that I don’t know how to make calculators, although this was the BASIC in all discussions, offering to give 600 UAH out of 10,000. To which there was an unequivocal answer - what is the point in such work, especially when it is the main, and not 1/17 of the work (as the performer estimated).
7. The deadline was promised around a week, in fact it is already the third week (since 22.07, when we agreed, it is also fixed in the correspondence in the telegram).
As a result, we have: the third week is coming (although the term was promised to be about a week), there is no mobile version, calculators are a big question (there are 2 of them), the pages are not completely completed, for installing a pixel, connecting Binotel and Tilda's CRM system, even more so it’s better to remain silent ..., before it is still three weeks again
I would also like to attach a video screen of the correspondence from the telegram, I think everything will become clear from it.
1 .TZ was sent out, the executive clarified a couple of questions, the brief did not give, I wrote how I imagine it, what I began to rush with the payment on the card.When I said that through the site it was safe - they began to talk about the commission and "I don't want to lose %", but still with the bad half formed through the site.2ndIn the final discussion before payment it was revealed that examples of sites (includingAnimations), presented as their own works, "have been done with some programmes", although for the work I clarified whether exactly all the works presented in the portfolio are the performers, which was an approved answer (the video screen of the correspondence in the telegram would also like to attach)
ThreeI asked to make a video as on the site-example, which was also the answer "Oh, I can't find someone else on the video", although the order was placed directly with this subpoint.4 .Also before the payment I proposed again to go on all the questions, what was the answer"the main went, all ok", but after the payment I was told that, it turns out, for the second language you need to pay 1000 UAH (ATHER, OPT-TAKY visible on the map), although on the site-example was just 2 languages. Well, ok, I thought, although already here an unpleasant doubt lurked, as if the performer did not specify this on purpose, but wrote that we would discuss it in more detail later.
5. I also wrote and reminded, painted the same questions 3-4 times (apparently it was difficult for the performer to look a little higher in the correspondence), the mobile version is still not ready
6. At the end of the second week (a period of a week was promised), the performer suddenly declares that I don’t know how to make calculators, although this was the BASIC in all discussions, offering to give 600 UAH out of 10,000. To which there was an unequivocal answer - what is the point in such work, especially when it is the main, and not 1/17 of the work (as the performer estimated).
7. The deadline was promised around a week, in fact it is already the third week (since 22.07, when we agreed, it is also fixed in the correspondence in the telegram).
As a result, we have: the third week is coming (although the term was promised to be about a week), there is no mobile version, calculators are a big question (there are 2 of them), the pages are not completely completed, for installing a pixel, connecting Binotel and Tilda's CRM system, even more so it’s better to remain silent ..., before it is still three weeks again
I would also like to attach a video screen of the correspondence from the telegram, I think everything will become clear from it.
