Budget: 5000 UAH Deadline: 30 days
Hello!
Trying to manually "click through" 150+ pages and forms to search for bugs is using a person in the role of a script, which guarantees missing critical errors during the next website update. Real quality control at such volumes (especially with the complex logic of databases that I encounter in OpenCart-SAP level integrations) requires checking the integrity of the architecture, not endless manual page browsing.
Automation instead of the illusion of control: Manually filling out dozens of forms on different devices after each developer edit is a systematic waste of time. All conversion nodes (validation, data transfer, formatting) must be covered by basic automated tests that eliminate the human factor and instantly capture failures.
Data flow is more important than pixels: Responsive layout and text readability do not matter if the sent data is lost due to script conflicts or does not reach the database. Testing should focus on the seamless path of the lead (from click to backend), not just on the visual displacement of buttons.
Speed analytics instead of static reports: A one-time collection of PageSpeed scores for a hundred pages will be outdated the next day. Instead of manually fixing numbers, it is necessary to implement systematic performance monitoring (TTFB) and timeout logging to see real "bottlenecks" during live user interactions.
What business result do you expect from manually collecting tables with hundreds of visual bugs if the current approach allows developers to subtly "break" key contact forms during the next release?
Sincerely, Arseniy.