The Google Smart Shopping
17 USD
The project was completed, but the collaboration and execution remained unsatisfied.Quality of work: the executive does not think it is necessary to contact the customer and discuss the points of the project, but simply does at his own discretion or does nothing at all.So it was not installed (replaceed) the brand logo of the store - the question is why?The executive accused me that I did not provide access, but Elena, all the access you requested I gave you.I don’t understand this, and I did exactly what you told me, you asked for access, showed where and what – I gave it to you.If you don’t know what access you need to do, it’s your problem, but it’s not mine.In any case, you could request this access in addition, and I had provided it to you, but you just decided to do it silently at your discretion, ignoring the customer.Additional questions were answered by quotes or screenshots from a Google reference, instead of making their words accessible and understandable to answer.Per the artist himself does not very much understand some points, but simply learned in the Google tools by examples to click with a mouse, without understanding the essence of values and settings, otherwise why not answer the human language?Cost: in the project the executor made a bet of 500 UAH, but then asked 600 - I agreed, as the difference is small, but the moment itself is not understandable for me.The level of communication with the customer: here everything is quite bad... Unfortunately, Elena communicates with a constant claim, one-type answers, which is more like communicating with a robot than with a man.There is a situation that you pay money and feel guilty for every question.But it’s still a little bit compared to what happened when the execution carried out the project.Elena said the project was finished, I said I’m checking closer to the evening, as it’s now busy.In the evening, Elena began to crack me with messages why I didn’t complete the project when I can check it.Since the evening came, but I was still busy with the work matters, I said I don’t know when I can check, because I couldn’t know when I’ll get rid of the work matters.What Elena began to write to me that she has done the project, and that means I have to leave everything and check it or complete the project.I answered that I have the right to check before the project is completed and as soon as time comes, I will check the project and if everything is fine, I will complete it.Since Elena has already communicated on the edge of adequacy and her demands and pressure to urgently complete the project warned me, I decided to close access to my Google account at the time of checking, as I thought that with such an approach the execution me something breaks there.And further the apogee of events: Elena began accusing me of fraud that I won’t pay – although the project was through a safe deal, through a seafood, i.e.If the executor has completed the project he has nothing to worry about, he is guaranteed to receive the payment, as the money I have already paid on the exchange account.This even more annoyed me, as for the first time in about 10 years I encountered the fact that during the deal through the seafood the executor behaved so.Even with direct payment to the executor without a safe transaction after the performance of the task and the closure of the accesses, no one executor has never done it.And further the peak of events: Elena is going to the arbitration!!!The !For what?For that I insisted on my legal law - to check the work of the RK and only after that to complete the project and I need time to do so?I explained the situation in the arbitration, I was confirmed that I have all the rights for time to check and ONLY after checking the work in the project has to complete the project.And the same was said by Elena that the customer (i.e. I) has the right to time to check the project.This is the result of cooperation.What can be said, the money is paid, no fraud from my side was and could not be, but the nerves are spent.To the collaboration of this artist I do not recommend, since it is possible where and what to click on the Google tools Elena somehow learned, but communicate, conduct dialogue, humanly answer additional questions - Elena has not yet learned.And during the execution of the project, communication is an indispensable moment - in which Elena has not just a failure, but Marian's fall.If you’re expensive your time, nerves and you’re used to treat you with respect as a customer, then you’re not to Elena Razumovskaya, since all this is simply strange to Elena, she thinks that everyone should “song under her dude” completely ignoring the customer’s opinion and the rules of the exchange!Executives on the topic of the advertising tinting on the exchange thanks to God more than enough, so my sincere advice to you who is now reading this review, choose someone else as an executive, but just not Elena, so that you don’t get all the “prints” of cooperation that came to me!by P.S. I will predict a lot of lies and dirt that will be in the response from Elena, because during the project communication, on each of my comments or requests, I received a lot of text in which there was no design or understanding or manifestation of desire to understand the situation, or to give a human answer to the question!Instead of just apologizing and calming, Elena prefers to throw problems out of her finger, see fraud where she simply can’t be and blame the customer for her fault.In the general style of the work of Elena Razumovskaya and her relationship with the customer I described you.I do not recommend cooperation!
