Andrii K.

1 .The main problem is communication.It was almost not there.We asked to respond to the customer’s comments.Usually in service teams when the designer has a customer project, he actively communicates with the customer and fundamentates his design.For this, you don’t even need a chat with the client, you’re going to play a figure.Just as in our case.There was not enough communication with me.Banally a few times asked to make clear and clear questions, whether to answer our questions, this was not.It should be easier to formulate opinions.The 2ndLack of immersion in the project.From the very beginning when the bag was transmitted, the description of it, where the language was discussed, was about the fact that it was a marketing band.Here you need to catch the user, propose solutions that can better sell.It was necessary to increase the conversion rather than make a straight page similar to the one that was already in the client.3 .The absence of an adequate assessment of time due to misunderstanding of the task.Dedline on the design development was a week included with adaptations.If I’m not mistaken, we’ve been driving with Leptop for a few weeks and waiting for you to answer the customer’s question.and 4.If the customer insists on a decision (usually this happens if the designer cannot give what will be really good level), then it is better to make this decision.As with a slider.At that point the customer had already seen that he could not what he needed and inserted the designer.In this case, it is better to do what you ask.and 5.Too simple styles.In addition to making the right architecture (which is also under question) the ui/ux designer should offer what the interface will differentiate qualityly.That is, you don’t need to imagine new ux practices and invent the rover, since certain user patterns are already an axiom, you should offer new interesting and at the same time understandable styles in combination with graphics (graphic work was not at all, it could save the marketing band).That is, the round button (the customer asked to make it normal) will not be clear for the user that this is exactly the CTA he needs to press.6 .It is in order in the Macket.Because of the chaos, it was unclear what and where to look at.The design should be understandable not only to the designer but also to the developer or customer, sometimes even to the user (in the case of a feedback and a primary analysis).Moreover, if even another designer will work in the design, he should be immediately clear where it is.The duplication of almost the same pages disrupts this, as well as the incomprehensible number of excess pages of the model.