I have noted these positive aspects of cooperation:
Alexander is always in contact and responds quickly.- - - -
These are the negative aspects of cooperation:
Alexander is a trick.For the first time, he asked to add access to his second mail ( " ****[email protected] please send to this mail invit to the figure.The previous Invit is no longer working.”I perfectly understood that it could not be so that the previous invit didn’t work, and after my comment it turned out that the reason was not at all in that.And the real reason: “Nastia, this is my subordinate, I have 4 designers in the team.She helps me to do separate elements...I was just very busy yesterday and failed to do what I planned.“”TheWell let the girl help, but why do you trick and say that access doesn’t work?Evidently Alexander wanted to hide the fact of his colleague’s help.The second time I asked to count how many slides were made for the presentation, Alexander counted for $260.When I started counting, it turned out that it was 190...that is, as if not $10 error.2) The quality of the work is weak, according to the measures of the average designer.I think the problem isn’t in the designers’ skills, but in a hurry to close the project because some slides were sent as “and suddenly prokatit.”3) Alexander may not check the work of his employee, but simply forward me that everything is ready.But when I look at the slide, I see again the same, the hallture work or the banal unnecessary objects that accidentally forgot to remove.Better, the manager should check the work, give the staff directions, and I should not waste time on banal corrections.