A subjective review based on my experience of cooperation with and performers.1 .Quality of work is satisfying.The overall level of work done, the absence of errors, the presence of documentation: English level is low..grammatic errors and translation.The documentation of the work is absent.It was necessary to "forecast doc.information regarding the technical part"
2ndProfessionalism - expected more than the level of communication with the customer.A sense of pursuit of the rating, not the result of the work and its acceptance by the customer.My first remarks on the quality of the initial work were perceived as a stick and a negative reaction.ThreeCost: I would prefer a more exaggerated price, but obtained quality result.This work is half done, a lot of content and filling remains to be completed.4 .Connectivity: The network responds quickly.We have not been able to connect through other means of mobile communications, social networks until today.and 5.Time: fast, does not mean quality.6 .The arbitration is opened by the executor against me as a customer due to the untimely closing of the project.The reason described above, I had quality claims, which were only partially eliminated.Information support is low, expected more from the performers with such a high rating.The site is not completed, the second part is still completed.I’m not going to add any work results files, as my site is absolutely not in accordance with the nature of the business.
2ndProfessionalism - expected more than the level of communication with the customer.A sense of pursuit of the rating, not the result of the work and its acceptance by the customer.My first remarks on the quality of the initial work were perceived as a stick and a negative reaction.ThreeCost: I would prefer a more exaggerated price, but obtained quality result.This work is half done, a lot of content and filling remains to be completed.4 .Connectivity: The network responds quickly.We have not been able to connect through other means of mobile communications, social networks until today.and 5.Time: fast, does not mean quality.6 .The arbitration is opened by the executor against me as a customer due to the untimely closing of the project.The reason described above, I had quality claims, which were only partially eliminated.Information support is low, expected more from the performers with such a high rating.The site is not completed, the second part is still completed.I’m not going to add any work results files, as my site is absolutely not in accordance with the nature of the business.
