OpenCart ordering page
112 USD
What can I say about work with Maxime and my project?I would like to start with the fact that at the very beginning of my work I was organized a google meet call where I told how the site looks now, showed the current ordering (was installed and set Simple, and also worked integration with the New Mail module).Showing the order design in Figma.I have repeatedly asked Maxime whether it is clear if I need a more detailed explanation on one or another part of the function.The technical side of the function was exposed on the designs and was present in the drawn design.I want to note that Maxime and his colleague Nikita approached the development of my project.Later it became clear that Maxim is responsible for the backend development, and his colleague for the wing and frontend.In the process of starting the work were immediately discussed the deadlines, which will be ready in 10 days, well for myself I noted that there will be 2 weeks to perform (with stock), a week to test, and a week to put the routes to the final option.But how did I then make a mistake in my assumptions...but about everything in order.To my surprise, it was revealed that Nikita (who was responsible for the line and front) made a lot of mistakes and did not adhere to the pattern.In many places there were distinctions, there was a different font size, the color could differ.and so on.I thought I put all the lines into a separate document, fixing what to be corrected (screenshot and explanation).In the other way, as accepted, and as previously worked with all the performers.To my observations that we can see the difference, that there are substantial differences in some places, the performer (Nikita) did not react at all and did not be able to prove that we have a lot of right in the process of work.Everything changes in the summer.On my side I want to notice that the directions were these and touched his "cats" in the work and the usual negligence.When such small rectangles accumulated more than 30 with me contacted Maxim and said that we often change the design because of this everything happens.I explained that the design is not changing, and his colleague simply doesn’t see his small bugs and that’s why the right is so much.We agreed that we will organize a call on Google Meet and in real-time his colleague Nikita will fix everything.The call was organized and lasted for 15 minutes, after which Nikita said he had to go somewhere urgently and we will continue afterwards.So in expectations passed more than a week, but the call was never and the directions were not made.After that, I wrote to Maxime that he would help in this matter, but in this way it took two more weeks.During this time, two or three directions were made.After such a long period of uncertainty, I began to force the situation, but there were no movements in my question.A week later I tried to get Maxima, but he turned to his job and dropped my phone calls and asked to write in text form.Probably the rule of ethics in this case we will miss and the example of the normal behavior of the executor should still be done.As a result, a few days later the correspondence came to the fact that they won’t continue the project because it took them a lot of time and they wrongly assessed the volume of work and it would be easier for them not to start my project.It has been 2.5 months since the start of the project.Because of this, I was decided to find new executives who could continue the project and complete it, because the deadlines were not in any framework and I didn’t expect it to take so much time.Through communication with another developer we started to perform the work.Initially, he corrected the points on the track (about 60 points), which remained from the previous performers and took the backend.During the process of work, the non-professionalism was revealed in the part of the wardrobe (which Nikita was responsible for).The work was done completely wrong, and we had to switch everything from scratch.Approximately after 2-3 weeks of work, when we were already in the phase of the final direct suddenly for us contacted Maxim and offered his help in the work.In the process of communication, one good solution was considered, which was useful to us later.Currently, the project is ready at 98% and there are some points that we correct in the process of testing by real visitors.As a result of cooperation with Maxime, I want to say the following:
The plus:
normal communication, he himself came to dialogue after a long period of time, offered his help and asked for the project
The Minutes:
a weak team (this goes for his colleague Nikita), who was engaged in the line and was unprofessional prepared.Maxim's advice for the future is to select the team more carefully.The deadlines for the implementation of the project were erroneously assessed.
The plus:
normal communication, he himself came to dialogue after a long period of time, offered his help and asked for the project
The Minutes:
a weak team (this goes for his colleague Nikita), who was engaged in the line and was unprofessional prepared.Maxim's advice for the future is to select the team more carefully.The deadlines for the implementation of the project were erroneously assessed.
