I have already written the qualification paper, the only thing is that I received a mountain of corrections, and I can't manage to fix everything on my own. I will send the methodology in messages because I can't upload two files at once. Here are the corrections:
In the topic: "stress"; "coping resources".
And in the plan, there is a lot of attention to: adaptation; training; psychosomatics.
Because of this, it is unclear what you are researching:
Is it the study of stress?
Adaptation?
Effectiveness of training?
Coping resources?
"Psychological stress in internally displaced persons and resources for overcoming it"
But in the plan itself, it is mixed:
stress;
adaptation;
resilience;
psychosomatics;
self-regulation;
training;
coping strategies.
As a result, it is unclear:
What exactly is being researched as the main phenomenon;
What is the cause;
What is the consequence;
What is the resource.
Psychosomatics here looks "foreign". The point: "Psychosomatic and self-regulation methods" looks inserted separately. Psychosomatics is a very broad separate topic.
Good morning, Yuriy. 1. The text of the qualification paper must be printed with a line spacing of 1.5 (up to thirty lines per page), margins: top, bottom – 20 mm, left side – 30 mm, right side – 15 mm; paragraph – 1.25 mm; font – Times New Roman, size – 14. 2. The headings of the structural parts of the qualification paper are printed in bold capital letters symmetrically to the text. 3. This is not a course paper. 4. The object, subject, and purpose of the research do not correspond to the topic of the research. 5. The introduction provides a justification for the relevance of the researched problem (1-2 paragraphs) and the necessity of conducting the research, revealing the essence and state of the scientific problem, its significance, grounds, and initial data for developing the topic. The highlighting of relevance should not be verbose. 6. Each structural part of the qualification paper should start on a new page. Page numbering, sections, figures, tables, formulas are presented in Arabic numerals without the sign №.
The list of used sources must contain at least 50 items. All scientific sources presented in the list must have references in the text of the bachelor's qualification paper. The list of used sources, formatted in accordance with all current requirements, must necessarily include the latest editions of works by Ukrainian and foreign researchers, including electronic media and internet sources.
Section 2 is poorly formulated
"Empirical research of stress states"
This is very general and unclear.
Stress states – what exactly?
Anxiety?
Distress?
PTSD?
Emotional exhaustion?
2.1 is very problematic
"Goals, tasks, methodologies of social-psychological training"
Here they are mixed:
Methodology of research;
Methodologies;
Training.
These are three different things.
The logic of the sections is violated
The biggest problem:
In 3.1, it presents:
"Results of diagnosing stress and resilience"
But the results of the diagnosis should be in the empirical section (Section 2), not after the training.
It is not visible: hypotheses; scientific novelty; clear variables. And without this, the work risks being just a summary.
