Assessment of the current Next.js platform and plan for further development according to Figma.

Hello!

Your task for auditing and planning is exactly what I do as a Team Lead and architect. My goal is not just to "look at the code," but to provide you with a business tool for making an informed decision: whether to invest in the current foundation or build a new one.

Why I am suitable for this task:

Deep expertise in your stack: I have been working with Next.js, TypeScript, and Supabase for over 6 years. I know the "pitfalls" of Supabase Auth and PostgreSQL, as well as how they integrate with Stripe.

Experience in refactoring and migrations: I have successfully conducted migrations of complex SaaS projects to new architectures (for example, implementing Turbo Monorepo), which allowed for a 40% acceleration in development and reduced technical debt.
…
Systematic approach: In my current role as Team Lead, I lead a team of 10 developers, where I am responsible for code quality, architectural decisions, and technical documentation.

How I will conduct the audit:

Backend/Database Analysis: Assessment of schema cleanliness in Supabase and the security of Row Level Security (RLS). If the backend is reliable, maintaining it will save you a significant portion of the budget.

Frontend Audit (Next.js): Analysis of component structure for compliance with the new Figma design. I will determine what can be reused and what is easier to code from scratch to support scalability.

Infrastructure check: Evaluation of the current environment on DigitalOcean (Nginx/PM2) and recommendations for optimizing CI/CD.

As a result, you will receive a document that answers all your questions:

A clear plan: what goes "under the knife," what goes into work.

Phased approach (MVP -> Full release) for quality and budget control.

A list of necessary specialists and risk assessment.

My portfolio and experience: https://mcarrow.online.

I am ready to start reviewing materials (Figma/Code) immediately after access is provided. My task is to ensure that your investments work as efficiently as possible.

Sincerely,
Sergey Makarov

Show original

Translate

Good day, Victoria! Thank you for the clearly formulated task — this is exactly the format where strong technical assessment is important before investing in a new version, rather than developing "blindly."

I conduct similar audits and technical consulting: I help understand whether it is worth scaling the current product or if it is more beneficial to rebuild the architecture to avoid wasting time and budget in the future.

I have practical experience working with your stack (Next.js, React, TypeScript, Supabase, Stripe), so the assessment will not be superficial, but will take into account the real limitations and capabilities of the technologies.

What I will do as part of the task:

— Conduct an audit of the current architecture (front / back / integrations)
… — Assess the quality and scalability of the code
— Compare the current implementation with the new design in Figma (how realistically it can be "stretched" without pain)
— Determine where it is technically justified to reuse code and where it is cheaper to rewrite

As a result, you will receive a clear technical conclusion.

I work with a focus on business solutions: not "what is technically better," but "what is more advantageous in terms of time, risks, and money."

Timeline:
3–5 days after receiving access

I am ready to connect quickly — this stage is indeed critically important before starting new development.

Show original

Translate

Victoria, good afternoon!
The task is clear, conducting an assessment is a good decision, it will reduce further costs.
Since I have experience in developing such platforms. To better understand the scope of work and to provide some estimate, I need to understand the overall picture, who did what, what the current logic is, and whether it needs to be significantly changed during the redesign. It is also necessary to understand the scope of work for the redesign, what the platform's task is, to determine whether the use of Next.js is justified.

I am waiting for a response in private.

I work through a safe.
Available 24/7.

Show original

Translate

Hello! We are a team of developers with 4 years of experience in creating and auditing high-load web solutions. We have deep expertise in Javascript/Typescript and modern frontend architecture. We are ready to conduct a detailed technical audit of your Next.js platform, assess code cleanliness, the effectiveness of architectural solutions, and potential for scalability. Our experience in developing projects with complex interfaces (such as farfieworld.com) allows us to see not only errors but also opportunities for performance optimization.

What you will receive as a result of the audit:
- Analysis of the project structure and compliance with Next.js Best Practices.
- Check of rendering speed (SSR/SSG) and query optimization.
- Assessment of scalability and readiness for integration of new modules.
- Step-by-step plan for fixing identified issues and further development.

We are ready to discuss the current state of the platform and provide a professional assessment. Price: 5,000 (depends on the volume of code). Deadline: 2-3 working days. We look forward to collaborating!

Show original

Translate

Hello, please send your current website and the company layout in a private message. This is to minimally assess the task without access to the database architecture.

Show original

Translate

Hello. I have extensive experience with Next.js/Node.js. I am ready for collaboration!)

Show original

Translate

Hello!

Below are preliminary theses on your 8 points showing how I think.

1. Can the current code be used as a foundation?
In most similar projects, yes, partially. Next.js + Supabase + Stripe is a healthy modern stack; there is no point in changing it just for the sake of change. The real answer depends on the quality of the database schema, business logic, and integrations, which is verified during the audit.

2. What is usually preserved?
PostgreSQL schema and migrations, integrations (Stripe, Resend, Supabase Auth), server-side business logic, infrastructure (DO, Nginx, PM2), domain models.
…
3. What is more often rewritten?
The UI layer according to the new Figma, design system on Tailwind, frontend state, transition to App Router if still on Pages. A combined option ("keeping the backend, starting the frontend from scratch") is usually the most rational.

4. Technical risks (preliminary)
- The connection of Supabase RLS with UI logic: if RLS was written for the current frontend, reworking the UI will also require changes to the policies.
- Stripe webhooks and data migration without downtime.
- Lack of tests and vendor lock-in on Supabase.

5. Stages
I work in 6 stages:
a. audit and decision
b. design system and frontend foundation
c. key user flows
d. payments/email/secondary flows
e. data migration and parallel launch
f. switching to production and stabilization.
Each stage includes a demo and a point of exit.

6. Specialists
For the combined option: fullstack lead (TS/Next.js), frontend (Next.js + Tailwind), backend on a partial load (Supabase/Postgres/Stripe), QA in the final stages, designer for support. I can cover the role of fullstack lead.

7. Timelines and budget
It is unprofessional to name specific figures before the audit. The industry benchmark is 2.5-4 months of team work. A precise estimate will be provided after the audit.

8. What to do first
An audit lasting 2-3 working days at a fixed cost. The output: answers to all 8 of your points, a map of "keep / rewrite / discard," an exact estimate by stages, and a recommendation (full rewrite vs combined vs iterative rework).
This document is yours, even if you decide to work with another contractor later.

Thank you for your response.

Show original

Translate

Hello Victoria,
I specialize in the architecture of complex SaaS solutions. I will help you make the right decision: to develop the current code or to build a new version from scratch.

What I will do:
- Code and database audit: I will assess the cleanliness of Next.js components, the logic of Supabase (RLS, schemas), and the stability of integration with Stripe.
- Figma analysis: I will determine whether it is feasible to adapt the existing frontend to the new design or if it is more rational to redesign it "from a clean slate," while preserving the backend logic.
- Technical conclusion: I will prepare a report with a risk assessment, a list of modules to retain, and a step-by-step development plan. I will also provide an architectural analysis.
- Budget and timelines: I will calculate realistic launch stages to minimize downtime and protect your investments.

… Why me:
I have over 6 years of experience in IT. I use AI tools to accelerate code analysis, allowing me to deliver results that are deeper and faster than a standard audit. Your stack is my main specialization.

I am ready to familiarize myself with Figma and access credentials to provide specific recommendations.

Best regards,
Ksenia

Show original

Translate

I understand the task: it is necessary to evaluate the current Next.js platform and make an informed decision — to improve it, rewrite it, or separate the frontend/backend before implementing the new design from Figma. I will conduct an audit of the code, architecture, and infrastructure (Next.js, Supabase, Stripe, etc.), after which I will provide a clear technical conclusion with risks, recommendations for reuse, and an optimal strategy option (refactor / rewrite / hybrid). I will prepare a step-by-step development plan with an assessment of timelines, budget, and team composition, so you can make a decision without losing current investments. I am ready to quickly get involved, review the accesses, and deliver results in a short timeframe.

Show original

Translate

Hello, Victoria! I am ready to evaluate your existing platform and answer your questions, please reach out, the deadline is up to 3 days.

Show original

Translate

Hello! I will complete your task quickly and efficiently. I will do a quick analysis.

My recent works
https://florist-map.vercel.app
https://indexfast.pp.ua
https://monitortest.pp.ua
https://mamamia.pp.ua

My portfolio: https://freelancehunt.com/ua/freelancer/romas6ka.html#portfolio
… Write to me, I will start working today. I will be happy to collaborate with you!

Show original

Translate

Good day, I understand the task and have relevant experience. I will prepare a technical report using Next.js and Postgres. I suggest discussing the price and deadlines in private messages. I am ready to start now and will be happy to collaborate.

Show original

Translate

Good day!
I am ready to conduct an expert evaluation of your platform. My tech stack fully matches the specified: Next.js, React, TypeScript, Tailwind, Supabase, Stripe, as well as infrastructure setup (DigitalOcean, Nginx, PM2).
How the work will proceed:
1. I will study the new layouts in Figma to assess the scale of changes.
2. I will review the current repository, architecture, database structure in Supabase, and Stripe subscription logic.
3. I will evaluate the feasibility of a hybrid approach (keeping the backend, rewriting the frontend) compared to complete refactoring or development from scratch.
Audit results:
You will receive a short and structured technical report with answers to all your questions:
• Viability of the current foundation.
… • A detailed list of what can be retained and what needs to be rewritten.
• Identification of technical risks.
• A step-by-step plan for developing the new version for quality control.
• Assessment of necessary specialists, timelines, and budget by stages.
• Recommendations for preserving already invested funds.
My recent full-stack projects (Next.js, payment integrations, complex databases):
• paymex.io (admin panel)
• mybestsonggift.com
• artmastermops.net.ua

Show original

Translate

Victoria, good afternoon!

I work with this stack every day: Next.js + TypeScript + Tailwind + Stripe in production at cyanship.com (feel free to visit, check the architecture and code). Supabase is PostgreSQL under the hood, I read the schema and RLS fluently.

How I will conduct the audit:
– I read the repository: architecture, dependencies, technical debt
– I compare the current code with Figma: what is reused as is, what needs to be rewritten
– I check Supabase (schema, RLS, policies), Stripe integration, Auth logic
– I provide a document with answers to all 8 points + a short Loom screen breakdown
…
From you: read access to the repository and Supabase, a link to Figma, a 15-minute call at the beginning to understand the business goals of the new version (this affects the risk assessment).

Deadline is 3 working days after receiving access.

Show original

Translate