Budget: 12000 UAH Deadline: 4 days
We can take a technical audit of the deliverability and architecture of the email flow. For the budget, I would allocate 12,000 UAH and 3-4 working days to analyze DNS, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, eSputnik, transactional emails from Goodshop, and options to normalize dmarc=fail.
Look, there’s a nuance - the DMARC Alignment Fail at Goodshop is likely not fixable with just a nice DNS record. We need to understand if we can redirect the transactional flow to an external SMTP with your domain's signature, or separate the flows by subdomains, or change the From scheme and DKIM. I would keep it simple - first, we check the actual email headers, then we choose the option with minimal risk for orders and reputation.
> In the end, I will provide a clear scheme - which records to change, which services to use, how to separate bulk and transactional emails, how to go from p=none to p=quarantine without losing important emails.
> I will also provide a warming and recovery schedule for eSputnik - without magic, because email reputation loves discipline, not shamanism =)
Let me clarify two things.
> Is there access to Google Postmaster Tools, Cloudflare DNS at Goodshop and eSputnik, or do we need to work with screenshots and exports?
> Can you provide 2-3 sources of problematic transactional emails with full headers showing dmarc=fail?
Similar cases of systemic work from Ingello
> https://business.ingello.com/prime-eva - e-commerce and systemic integration of processes for retail
> https://business.ingello.com/eva - complex e-commerce infrastructure and work with business processes
> https://business.ingello.com/vorfahr - automation and linking of external services, where it’s important not just to connect a service, but to build a sustainable architecture
The main page for our approach to projects from the marketplace - https://systems-fl.ingello.com
In terms of format - to avoid risking accounts on the marketplace, we will start with a written audit and architecture of the solution within the project. After a short design phase, we can agree on an acceptable format for discussion as required by the marketplace. Overall, it’s fine, the main thing is not to guess with MXToolbox, but to gather facts and carefully lift the domain from Low/Medium.