Developing a new website design
The Quality:
He gave the samples, said as I wanted.We had to have a quality-looking website.The result I would assess by 3 out of 5, or 4-, if the mood is good.. the site is not every day made, and if it is rebuilt, then it should be cheerful, quality and do not cause suspicion of what his student did as a hostess in the institute.Examples in investment.The Professionalism:
I cannot evaluate.The result is weak.It was 7 because.Exactly higher than me.You can count this answer from 4 to 10.The cost:
Not cheap, but not much more expensive than the average index.For a good result, overpayment is not enough.If the result is medium, it is expensive.I was looking for a good result, so I assess the price as good.The Contact:
Sometimes, the intervals between my question and answer were more than a week.I put 5 because.They did so.For justice, I’ll say that I’ve rushed the events only for the first month.Then he doesn’t answer, and it’s cool.He waited.The deadlines:
From the declared two!weeks (yes, I knew it would be longer), it was either 3.5 or 4 months.I don’t remember exactly.I wish to the freelancers.Don’t put real deadlines.Get close to reality.This is right.Lies are not a competitive advantage.I would not recommend it as a website designer.I would leave this review as negative, but then the payment will not come and I don’t want to not pay.But the result is bad and 99 percent that doesn’t go to work.by P.S.If any of the FH moderately moderate these reviews, please do something with the ratings system.Do you know how to scroll them or do you not evaluate them according to the criteria.